The Detrimental Impact of Zoos on Animal Welfare and Behaviour

The justification of zoo enclosures often relies on the provision of basic needs like food and shelter. While these may seem adequate, they fail to acknowledge the fundamental right of animals to live freely and according to their instincts. Imagine confining a human to a similar enclosure – it would be considered a gross violation of their liberty. This inherent right to freedom, often overlooked in the context of animal captivity, raises serious ethical concerns, explored further in this article: “Ethical Concerns in Zoos: Animal Welfare and Captivity”. Furthermore, the psychological and behavioral impacts of confinement, such as pacing, repetitive behaviors, and aggression, are a serious concern for animals in zoos, highlighting the detrimental effects of captivity on their well-being. Moreover, some zoos prioritize profit over animal welfare, focusing on entertainment and attracting visitors rather than providing adequate living conditions and enriching environments for the animals in their care.

Speciesism: The Ethics of Enslaving

Enslaving another being is inherently unethical. It represents a fundamental violation of basic moral principles and constitutes a form of oppression based on perceived differences. At its core, enslavement involves the exercise of dominance and control, reducing individuals to mere instruments for the benefit of the enslaver. This exploitation often includes the forced labor of the enslaved, denying them the freedom to determine their own lives and pursue their own goals.

The act of owning another being as property is a direct manifestation of this dehumanization. By treating individuals as commodities, enslavement strips them of their inherent dignity and autonomy. It disrupts the natural and free life of the enslaved, forcibly separating them from their natural environment, families, and communities. These individuals are often subjected to transportation across vast distances, enduring immense physical and psychological trauma during the process. This displacement serves the interests of the enslaver, who profits from the exploitation of the enslaved while denying them the basic rights and freedoms that all sentient beings deserve.

For those who value equality and are open to exploring this issue further, I highly recommend watching “Speciesism: The Movie,” a 2013 award-winning documentary by Mark Devries. As noted by the Huffington Post, this film has the potential to significantly alter viewers’ perspectives on the world.

The Limitations of Captivity on Evolutionary Processes

Animals confined to captive environments, such as zoos, are significantly limited in their ability to participate in natural selection, a fundamental process of evolution first described by Charles Darwin in 1859. This isolation from their natural habitats restricts their ability to adapt and evolve in response to environmental pressures.

In recent decades, public concern for animal welfare has grown considerably. This increased awareness led to a greater focus on the well-being of captive animals, with significant advancements in zoo animal care beginning in the mid-20th century. Heini Hediger’s 1950 publication, “Wild Animals in Captivity,” marked a turning point, initiating research into improving zoo enclosures and enhancing the welfare of captive animals. Early studies focused on understanding the behavioral and reproductive impacts of captivity, particularly in environments lacking sufficient stimulation.

Genetic diversity is crucial for the long-term survival of any species. Natural selection plays a vital role in maintaining and enhancing this diversity by favoring individuals with traits that are best suited to their environment. This process allows species to adapt to changing conditions and ensures the survival of the fittest. Other evolutionary mechanisms, including mutation, gene flow, genetic drift, and speciation, also contribute to the dynamic nature of the gene pool.

However, the captive environment can significantly interfere with these natural processes. While some level of selection may still occur within zoo populations, the limitations imposed by captivity can disrupt the natural evolutionary trajectory of these species. This can lead to a decline in genetic diversity and an increased vulnerability to disease and other threats.

Can Zoos Drive Animals to Insanity?

Captivity can affect an animal’s brain, causing them to exhibit behaviors that they wouldn’t normally exhibit in the wild. “Zoochosis” describes the emergence of abnormal, repetitive behaviors in captive animals, often lacking any discernible function. These stereotypies, such as pacing, circling, and bar biting, are rarely observed in wild animals and are widely recognized as indicators of poor welfare. Their presence suggests that the captive environment fails to adequately meet the animal’s physical and psychological needs, leading to stress, boredom, and frustration. The development of zoochosis can have serious consequences, including impaired reproductive success and hindering the effectiveness of captive breeding programs for conservation purposes. To better understand this phenomenon, consider the Born Free Foundation’s “Zoochotic Report,” which documented these behaviors in Figure 1.

Figure 1. “The Zoochotic Report” by the Born Free Foundation

Captive environments can have a profound impact on animal behavior. When animals lack control over their environment and daily routines, they may exhibit stress-related behaviors and experience decreased well-being. Research on “contra freeloading” demonstrates that many species prefer to work for their food rather than receive it passively (Forkman & Lazarus, 1997; Osborne, 1977). This highlights the importance of providing animals with choices and opportunities for engagement in their environment. These findings underscore the critical need to address the ethical concerns surrounding zoo animal welfare. By understanding and mitigating the negative impacts of captivity, such as the development of zoochosis, we can strive to create environments that better meet the physical and psychological needs of captive animals.

My Unforgettable Visit to the Zoo

As a child, I was timid and easily intimidated by the unfamiliar, so many of the animals at the zoo scared me. But like most kids, I was taken there by my parents, who framed it as an “enriching experience.” However, some truths are felt, not taught. For me, big cats were always a source of fascination, and I couldn’t wait to see them.

When we reached the enclosure, a panther or leopard immediately caught my attention. It was pacing endlessly along the fence, creating a dark, worn trail in the dirt. “Why is it doing that?” I asked my parents. I watched, wondering if it would ever stop, and I remember feeling that the cat seemed incredibly stressed and unhappy.

That image is something I will never forget. It didn’t make sense to my young mind—I had been told these animals had a good life at the zoo. I couldn’t name the problem, but my gut told me something was wrong. Looking back now, I’m amazed at how even a young child can instinctively recognize suffering in another species, even when the cause is a mystery.

Potential Displays of Zoochosis in Captive Animals

1. Locomotor Stereotypies

• Pacing: Repetitive walking back and forth along the enclosure boundaries.
• Circling: Continuously walking in circles within the enclosure.
• Swaying: Repetitive rocking motions of the body.

2. Oral Stereotypies

• Bar biting/gnawing: Biting or gnawing on enclosure bars, fences, or other objects.
• Tongue playing: Repetitive tongue movements, often licking or flicking.
• Coprophagia: Eating feces.
• Vomiting and Regurgitation: Repetitive vomiting or regurgitation, sometimes followed by re-ingestion.

3. Self-Directed Behaviors

• Excessive grooming: Over-grooming to the point of self-injury (e.g., hair pulling, feather plucking).
• Head bobbing/weaving: Repetitive movements of the head or body.
• Self-mutilation: Actions that cause harm to themselves (e.g., biting, hitting).

4. Social and Behavioral Abnormalities

• Reduced social interaction: Withdrawal from social interactions with other animals or with humans.
• Abnormal aggression: Increased aggression towards conspecifics (animals of the same species) or towards humans.
• Prolonged infantile behavior: Retaining juvenile behaviors into adulthood.
• Lack of apathy: Reduced responsiveness or enthusiasm.

5. Stress Response

• Loss of appetite: A common stress response in animals. Captivity can be highly stressful for animals, leading to a variety of physiological and behavioral changes, including decreased appetite. This stress can arise from various factors such as:
  • Lack of environmental enrichment: Boredom, lack of mental and physical stimulation.
  • Social isolation: Inability to interact with conspecifics (animals of the same species) in natural ways.
  • Human disturbance: Constant observation and noise from visitors can be stressful.
  • Lack of control: Animals in captivity often have limited control over their environment and daily routines.
• Medical conditions: In some cases, loss of appetite can be a symptom of underlying medical conditions, which may go unnoticed or untreated in captive environments due to limitations in diagnostic capabilities, inadequate veterinary care, or insufficient attention to individual animal needs.

Understanding Abnormal Repetitive Behaviors in Animals

Abnormal repetitive behaviors (ARB) in animals, such as pacing or bar biting, are well-documented through research on both domestic and captive wild animals. These behaviors, characterized by compulsive attempts to achieve inappropriate goals or inappropriate motor functions, can be categorized based on a report from the Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour and HE Animal Management. Assessing an animal’s ability to cope with its environment is crucial for evaluating its welfare. This includes recognizing situations where an animal’s enclosure fails to meet its needs, as demonstrated by cases where elephants and fish have been removed from zoos or aquariums due to insufficient space.

Can the Existence of Captive Animals in Zoos Ever Be Truly Ethical?

The inherent freedom of animals is a fundamental right that cannot be ethically compromised for human entertainment or profit. Zoos, despite claims of conservation or education, ultimately confine animals for human amusement. These enclosures, no matter how well-intentioned, can never truly replicate the complexity and freedom of an animal’s natural habitat. The psychological and behavioral impacts of captivity, such as pacing, repetitive behaviors, and aggression, are clear indicators of the profound stress and suffering these animals endure. While some zoos may strive to provide adequate living conditions, the very act of confining wild animals for human entertainment inherently violates their right to exist as free beings.

Potential Causes of Abnormal and Stereotypical Behaviors in Captive Animals:

1. Environmental Factors

• Inadequate Enrichment
  • Lack of Physical Stimulation: Insufficient space, lack of climbing structures, limited opportunities for foraging, and lack of opportunities to explore.
  • Lack of Mental Stimulation: Boredom, lack of cognitive challenges, and lack of opportunities to express natural behaviors (e.g., hunting, nesting).
• Sensory Deprivation or Over-stimulation
  • Sensory deprivation: Lack of visual, auditory, or olfactory stimulation.
  • Sensory overload: Excessive noise, bright lights, and constant human presence.
• Poor Environmental Conditions
  • Inappropriate temperature and humidity: Extremes in temperature or humidity can cause stress.
  • Poor air quality: Inadequate ventilation can lead to respiratory problems and stress.
  • Unhygienic conditions: Dirty enclosures can lead to stress and disease.
  • Confined spaces, lack of access to natural sunlight, and unnatural or barren environments.

2. Social Factors

• Social Isolation
  • Separation from conspecifics (animals of the same species) can lead to loneliness, anxiety, and behavioral abnormalities.
  • Inappropriate social groupings: Mismatched pairs or groups can lead to aggression and stress.
• Lack of Opportunities for Social Interaction
  • Limited opportunities for social play, grooming, and other social behaviors.

3. Psychological Factors

• Stress
  • Fear of humans, predators, or other animals.
  • Anxiety related to changes in routine or environment.
  • Distress due to separation from theır natural environment, family, and friends.
  • Frustration due to unmet needs.
• Fear and Anxiety:
  • Fear of humans: Due to aggressive handling, unpredictable interactions, or the use of aversive training methods.
  • Anxiety related to changes in routine or environment: Frequent moves, unpredictable schedules, and lack of control can cause significant stress.
• Cognitive Dysfunction
  • In some cases, abnormal behaviors may be associated with cognitive decline or neurological disorders.
• Emotional Trauma
  • Witnessing violence: Observing aggression between other animals or witnessing the mistreatment of other animals can cause severe emotional distress.

4. Physiological Factors

• Medical Conditions
  • Pain, illness, or injury can cause stress and lead to behavioral changes.
  • Nutritional deficiencies or imbalances.
• Effects of Drugs
  • Inadvertent side effects: Medications may have unintended consequences, such as sedation, lethargy, and behavioral changes.
  • Abuse of drugs: The use of drugs for purposes other than legitimate medical treatment, such as to subdue or control animals for training or performance.

5. Human-Inflicted Harm

• Physical Abuse
  • Hitting, kicking, or other forms of physical violence.
  • Improper handling and restraint techniques.
  • Nutritional deficiencies or imbalances.
• Emotional Abuse
  • Yelling, screaming, or other forms of intimidation.
  • Neglect and deprivation of basic needs, such as nutrition or medical needs.
  • Aversive training methods: The use of punishment-based training techniques, such as electric shocks or physical punishment, can cause severe psychological trauma.

5. Genetic Predisposition

• Some individuals may be genetically predisposed to develop certain types of stereotypes.

Beyond Animal Captivity: The Growing Movement for Ethical Change

While past generations may not have fully grasped the impact of human actions on animals, we now possess this knowledge. Yet, many animals remain captive for purely commercial purposes, mirroring the exploitation seen in industries like factory farming, circuses, and horse-drawn carriages. This includes countless animals who suffer as property, enduring enslavement, abuse, and often, brutal deaths.

However, a wave of positive change is sweeping across the globe. The animal rights movement is gaining momentum, fueled by a growing awareness of the suffering inflicted upon our fellow creatures. Organizations like the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) are actively working to rescue animals from cruelty and expose the injustices they face.

Their dedication and courage are inspiring, as documented in the powerful documentary “ALF: Behind The Mask“. This documentary provides a glimpse into the dangerous yet vital work of these individuals who risk their own freedom to liberate animals from the chains of human exploitation.

The Rise of Animal Sanctuaries & Animal Rights

The increasing popularity of animal sanctuaries highlights a more ethical approach to animal welfare compared to traditional zoos. Sanctuaries are dedicated to the well-being of rescued animals, providing them with expansive, naturalistic habitats where they can live free from exploitation and express their innate behaviors. Many sanctuaries, particularly those for farmed animals, uphold a strictly vegan ethos. This commitment extends their care and compassion to all animals, reflecting a deep-seated belief in animal liberation.

A key distinction between sanctuaries and zoos lies in their fundamental missions and financial structures. Animal sanctuaries are typically non-profit organizations that rely on donations, grants, and volunteer support to operate. Their primary goal is to provide a safe, permanent home for animals in need, with no emphasis on entertainment or profit. In contrast, many zoos operate as for-profit businesses. While they may claim to support conservation efforts, their reliance on ticket sales and concessions often means that the needs of the public—like viewing animals up close—can take precedence over the animals’ natural behaviors and privacy. This profit-driven model can compromise animal welfare, as smaller enclosures and repetitive public displays may be prioritized for visitor convenience and revenue generation.

Veganism is a powerful way to advocate for animal rights. By rejecting animal products, we directly challenge and dismantle the systems that exploit and commodify sentient beings. For a deeper dive into the complex relationship between humans and animals, we invite you to explore our other blog posts, such as: Understanding the Relationship Between Wild Animals and Human Presence. The growing animal rights movement calls for a fundamental shift in how we view and interact with other species. Zoos, a relic of a bygone era, are incompatible with a future built on compassion and respect for all living beings.

A More Ethical Future: Individual Responsibility

Individuals can make a significant impact by supporting ethical choices in daily life, from the food we consume to the products we purchase. Furthermore, engaging in the critical discourse surrounding ethical concerns in zoos, animal welfare, and captivity is essential for challenging the practice of confining animals solely for entertainment purposes. By actively participating in this conversation and advocating for animal welfare, we can move towards a future where all living beings are treated with the respect and dignity they deserve.

“Speciesism — like racism and sexism — is a form of what I call ‘meism’ — the more like me you are, the more empathy I will have for you and the more I will be concerned about your welfare. Is that a good basis for deciding whom to help?”

– Peter Singer

Animal lover? Check out A Guide to Going Vegan For the Animals for more ways to show your love for animals.
Brought to you by The Vegan Experience.